The best part:
You may have noticed that our country, formerly a republic of sovereign individuals, has become one great big racketeering operation run by a mafia-like cabal with Marxist characteristics — or, at least, Marxist pretenses. That is, it seeks to profit by every avenue of dishonesty and coercion, under the guise of rescuing the “oppressed and marginalized” from their alleged tormenters. Apparently, half the country likes it that way.
Much of the on-the-ground action in this degenerate enterprise is produced by various hustles. A hustle is a particularly low-grade, insultingly obvious racket, such as Black Lives Matter, DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), and “trans women” (i.e., men) in women’s sports. Some of the profit in any hustle is plain moneygrubbing, of course. But there’s also an emotional payoff. Hustlers and racketeers are often sadists, so the gratification derived from snookering the credulous (feelings of power) gets amplified by the extra thrill of seeing the credulous suffer pain, humiliation, and personal ruin. (That’s what actual “oppressors” actually do.)
Categorically, anyone who operates a racket or a hustle is some sort of psychopath, a person with no moral or ethical guard-rails. Hustles are based on the belief that it is possible to get something for nothing, a notion at odds with everything known about the unforgiving laws of physics and also the principles of human relations in this universe. Even the unconditional love of a mother for her child is based on something: the amazing, generative act of creating new life, achieved through the travail of birth. Have you noticed, by the way, that the birth of human children is lately among the most denigrated acts on the American social landscape?
The flap over Harvard’s president, Claudine Gay, is an instructive case in the governing psychopathies of the day. I wish I’d been a roach on the tray of petit fours and biscotti brought into the Harvard Overseers’ board-room when they met to consider the blowback from Ms. Gay’s unfortunate remarks in Congress, followed by revelations of her career-long plagiarisms. The acrid odor of self-conscious corruption in the room must have overwhelmed even the bouquet of Tanzanian Peaberry coffee a’brew, and not a few of the board members must have reached for the sherry decanter as their shame mounted, and the ancient radiators hissed, and their lame rationalizations started bouncing off the wainscoted walls.
He goes to hypothesize the ruin of Harvard, which I kind of doubt will happen, but even if it does, Harvard is just one tentacle of Cthulhu.
Update next day fixed formatting.
Any organization with a cause, something they feel many people are not aware of and should be means raising money to continue. That will automatically attract hustlers and conmen trying to get a piece of the action. That does NOT mean the people starting the organization nor the cause is invalid. Making the leap from organizer to sadist is ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteAn honest person who disagrees with a cause states their reasons rather than calling the people for it names and making false accusations with no substance. Maybe they’re the sadists.
I agree some of the con-men may be, but I think greed is still the primary motivation.
I see a lot of them working on political campaigns where the money flowing is astronomical. A $million donation will barely get you noticed, and a $million misdirected can go unnoticed for a long time especially in the run up to the election.
Black lives do matter. Discrimination for most reasons is unfair. Men shouldn’t be in women’s sports.
xoxoxoBruce