How the Navy Hears Subs 3,000 Miles Away. (It's Genius)
Second Order Science
- SOSUS - my run-in with SOSUS in college
- Star Trek Science - submarines so quiet they can't hear each other
Silicon Forest
If the type is too small, Ctrl+ is your friend
![]() |
| Demos Graph |
Old velocity from time formula
Solve the first formula for time
Substitute our new value for time into our velocity formula
Assign distance to x and that gives us the graph we have above.
If we view this graph as a car accelerating at a rate of a low 1/6 G, then by the time it has gone 80 feet (or six car lengths) it will be going pert near 30 MPH.
Using my 92 year old Walther RKZ mechanical calculator to calculate Pi. 355/113 is a very good approximation for the famous constant. It's a common example for mechanical calculators but it is still fun to see.
![]() |
| Einstein Tile |
Discovery of Elusive ‘Einstein’ Tile Raises More Questions Than It Answers
David Smith, a math hobbyist in Yorkshire, England, has discovered a 13-sided shape that eluded mathematicians for decades. The craggy, hatlike shape is called an “einstein,” based on the German for “one stone.” If you used einstein-shaped tiles to cover your bathroom floor—or any flat surface, even if infinitely large—they would fit together perfectly but never form a repeating pattern. For decades mathematicians have been hunting for tile shapes like these that can form only nonrepeating arrangements, called aperiodic tilings. They started with sets of many different tiles: the first set, discovered in 1964, required 20,426 distinct tiles, which was later simplified to 103. By 1974 mathematician Roger Penrose had found two tile shapes that, when combined in a mosaic, never formed a repeating pattern.
Someone ought to make some jigsaw puzzles using this pattern. Shoot, someone ought to make Einstein floor tiles.
Break Einstein into two words (Ein stein) and Google says it is 'a stone'.
Via Dennis
A couple of word problems told at Longbottom Coffeehouse today. The videos are not directly related to the text.
Medicine
A nurse needs to administer 115 milligrams of a medicine intravenously over a period of 75 minutes. The medicine will be administered through a hypodermic needle via an IV line using a calibrated pump. The pump wants the rate in milligrams per hour. What do you set the dial to?
The problem can be taken as a proportion: X milligrams over 60 minutes is proportional (equal) to 115 mg over 75 minutes:
Multiply both sides by 60. 60 over 60 on the left side cancels out leaving X by itself. Notice that 60 and 75 have a common factor of 15, reduce that and you are left with 4 over 5, which is the same as .8. Multiply that by 115 and you get 88 plus 4.0 which comes out to 92. Closest setting on the pump is 88, so that's where you set it.
Driving
You are driving down the freeway at 60 miles per hour following the car ahead of you at a distance of two seconds. (That is, you notice something by the side of the road that you can use as a marker. When the car ahead of you passes the mark, you start counting, one-thousand one, one-thousand two, until you reach that same marker.)
Trailing two seconds behind means you are 176 feet away. (60 MPH is equivalent to 88 feet per second, 88 times two is 176.) The question is - if the car you are following were to suddenly turn into a brick wall, would you be able to stop before you hit it?
For this I am going to pull out two of my favorite formulas:
We know the Velocity (88 FPS) and the Distance (176 Feet). Will this be enough to solve this equation?
| Substituting Velocity for AT in the second equation will give us | D = (1/2)VT |
| Substituting what we know for Velocity and Distance we get | 176 = (1/2)88T |
| Multiply | 176 = 44T |
| Divide both sides by 44: | 4 = T |
So if we can brake to a stop within four seconds, we will not hit the wall, the brand new wall that just suddenly appeared in the middle of the freeway.
Okay, how much strain is that going to cause? And will our car be able to do that?
Go back to our old friend V=AT and plug in our Time and Velocity and solve for Acceleration, we find that we need to slow down at a rate of 22 feet per second per second, which is like two-thirds of one gravity, so it might be possible. A race car would certainly be able to do, but how about my Korean sedan? Google says:
When it comes to the 2008 Hyundai Sonata's braking distance, specifically from 60 mph, Edmunds review indicates it is quite good for its class, coming in at less than 130 feet.
So we should be good, assuming we are paying attention, our reactions are on a hair trigger, the road surface is free of any kind of friction reducing substances, like ice, oil, dust or debris. So, in the real world, if you wake up and get your brake applied in time, you will probably hit the wall, but you probably wouldn't die in this completely fictional situation.
![]() |
| Masayoshi Son (1957 - ) Japanese Businessman |
![]() |
| Andrey Andreyevich Markov (1856 – 1922) Russian Mathematician |
![]() |
| Pavel Alekseevich Nekrasov (1853–1924) Russian mathematician |
In that same bookshop where I read that bit about baseball errors, there was also a box of free books for 'burning or your rage room'. Well, I gotta see what we have here, and what do I find? Several copies of J. D. Vance's Hillbilly Elegy along with several Harry Potter books. Remember this is northwest Portland, a very deep blue corner in a very blue state. I picked up Hillbilly Elegy and took it with me. We already have all the Harry Potter books.
I am about half way through, and so far it's been his life growing up amongst the hill folk, and a rough bunch they are. It's kind of amazing that he amounted to anything, much less Vice President of the United States.
Anyway, on page 58 I came across this little bit that I thought was entertaining. I mean, I thought I was a math whiz:
Alongside these conflicting norms about the value of blue-
collar work existed a massive ignorance about how to achieve
white-collar work. We didn't know that all across the country -
and even in our hometown - other kids had already started a
competition to get ahead in life. During first grade, we played a
game every morning: The teacher would announce the number of
the day, and we'd go person by person and announce a math equa-
tion that produced the number. So if the number of the day was
four, you could announce "two plus two" and claim a prize, usu-
ally a small piece of candy. One day the number was thirty. The
students in in front of me went through the easy answers - "twenty-
nine plus one," "twenty-eight plus two," "fifteen plus fifteen." I
was better than that. I was going to blow the teacher away.
When my turn came. I proudly announced. "Fifty minus
twenty" The teacher gushed, and I receive: two pieces of candy
for my foray into subtraction, a skill we'd learned only days
before. A few moments later, while I beamed over my brilliance,
another student announced, "Ten times three." I had no idea what
that even meant. Times? Who was this guy?
The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus (RMP; also designated as papyrus British Museum 10057, pBM 10058, and Brooklyn Museum 37.1784Ea-b) is one of the best known examples of ancient Egyptian mathematics.It is one of two well-known mathematical papyri, along with the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus. The Rhind Papyrus is the larger, but younger, of the two.In the papyrus' opening paragraphs Ahmes presents the papyrus as giving "Accurate reckoning for inquiring into things, and the knowledge of all things, mysteries ... all secrets". He continues:
This book was copied in regnal year 33, month 4 of Akhet, under the majesty of the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Awserre, given life, from an ancient copy made in the time of the King of Upper and Lower Egypt Nimaatre. The scribe Ahmose writes this copy.
Several books and articles about the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus have been published, and a handful of these stand out. The Rhind Papyrus was published in 1923 by the English Egyptologist T. Eric Peet and contains a discussion of the text that followed Francis Llewellyn Griffith's Book I, II and III outline. Chace published a compendium in 1927–29 which included photographs of the text. A more recent overview of the Rhind Papyrus was published in 1987 by Robins and Shute.
Farther down the Wikipedia page is this image:
![]() |
| Ancient Egyption Units of Measurement in the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus |
The present table is a concordance of ancient Egyptian units of measurement which are used throughout the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, an ancient Egyptian document which is a record of elementary mathematics. The papyrus consists of four sections:Many of the latter problems make use of certain ancient Egyptian units of measurement, whether of length, volume, time, or otherwise, and this is what the present table summarizes. It happens that none of the 2/n table, the 1-9/10 table, or even most of the first several problems 7, 7B, 8-34 make any mention of units, and they are therefore not included in this table.
- a title page with historical information,
- a table of fractional calculations for 2/3 - 2/101, or the "2/n table" (where n is always odd),
- a much smaller table of fractional calculations for the nine fractions 1/10 - 9/10, or the "1-9/10" table, and finally
- a series of 91 "problems" or numbers, which are numbered from 1-87 (a modern convention imposed on the document to differentiate the problems) and include four additional items designated by moderns as 7B, 59B, 61B, and 82B.
Almost all usage of units of measure is confined to the later problems in the papyrus (with some early exceptions, also listed), being the title page, problems 1-6, and problems 35-87, which include three additional items designated as 59B, 61B, and 82B.
For the title page and numbers 86-87, the context of the usage of units is not mathematical, but historical.
The units are grouped by unit type, and color-coded. From top to bottom, the unit types are:The seked is not strictly speaking a trigonometric item, but its context is so close to our modern understanding of trigonometry that we identify it with that word.
- length,
- area,
- volume (deben),
- monetary (sha'ty),
- trigonometric (seked),
- food/manufacturing (pefsu), and finally
- "foodstuff" (loaves, des-measure).
The pefsu is also a kind of derived unit of measure relating to food preparation and manufacturing.
Finally, the "loaf' is not really a standard unit of measure within the papyrus as such, but it is mentioned so frequently in related contexts that it merits its own entry. In any one problem, it can be interpreted as a measure of solid food.
Likewise, the "des-measure", mentioned in only a few problems, can be interpreted as a volume unit of liquid measure (especially in the context of food and drink) which is not immediately related to the other volume units.
Entries in black indicate that a given unit of measure is explicitly named or entailed in the problem, in the original document.
Entries in gray indicate that although the unit's word is not expressly stated in that problem, the context of the document makes clear that the unit is implicitly being used in the course of the problem's calculation, statement, etc.
Note that neighboring groups of problems often tend to entail similar units, although in some cases the units are merely strongly implied by context, as opposed to being explicitly stated in the original document.
In the Rhind Papyrus, units of a given type have precise, exact, simple relationships to one another, which conversion factors we can and therefore do easily express in modern terms, using only integers.
Although there is historical evidence that certain units of measure can be "concretely" compared with modern units, these exact specifications are not essential to reading the Rhind Papyrus as a mathematical document.
Indeed, one can read the papyrus has having an internally consistent system of units of measure, which is all that is presented in this table and explanation.
The reader is cautioned that ancient Egypt had a very long history, and that the present information about units pertains directly to the Rhind Papyrus only.
At other periods of ancient Egyptian history, certain units were taken to have different conversion factors relative to other units.
Among units of length, 1 khet = 100 cubits = 700 palms = 2800 fingers.
Among units of area, one square khet is called one setat, and 1 setat = 100 cubit strips, where one cubit strip is a rectangular strip of area being 1 cubit by 100 cubits (or any other sector of equal area).
Among units of volume, the following holds:2 cubic cubits = 3 khar = 60 heqats = 600 hinu = 19200 ro.
Furthermore as one might expect, the somewhat redundant "hundreds/multiples" versions of the heqat and the ro can be equated with those same "base units" in the following wise:1 hundred quadruple heqat = 2 hundred double heqats = 4 hundred heqats = 100 quadruple heqats = 200 double heqats = 400 heqats = 128000 ro = 64000 double ro = 32000 quadruple ro.
Combining these two chains of equalities, rearranging their terms, and expressing all of the units' conversion factors in the simplest terms of integers yields the following comparison among all of the standardized units of volume measurement in the Rhind Papyrus:3 hundred quadruple heqats = 6 hundred double heqats = 12 hundred heqats = 300 quadruple heqats = 600 double heqats = 1200 heqats = 40 cubic cubits = 60 khar = 12000 hinu = 384000 ro = 192000 double ro = 96000 quadruple ro.
Among time units, since the Egyptian month is always exactly 30 days, then 6 years = 73 months = 2190 days. The remaining units, being of different types and not having simple or relevant conversion factors into other units of like type (at least as far as the papyrus itself is concerned) are therefore not expanded upon here.
Another post about ancient mathematics: the Babylonian Plimpton 322 clay tablet. It dates from 1800 BC, so roughly the same era the Rhind Papyrus.
![]() |
| Get Fuzzy |
![]() |
| Big Couch |
We got to move these refrigerators
We got to move these colour TVs
![]() |
| United States of Voronoi |
I just learned about this. This is one of those things that's easy to see but difficult to describe.
![]() |
| Voronoi Cells |
A Voronoi diagram partitions a plane around points or "seeds" within it. It THINK it divides the area so that the boundaries are always halfway between one seed and the next closest seed.The official description is, boundaries are drawn so that all points within that boundary, are closer to its seed, than to any other seed.If each seed was a repelling magnet, would this describe the same boundaries?Here [image at top] it's used to draw state boundaries around state capitals.