Intel's Ronler Acres Plant

Pergelator

Silicon Forest
If the type is too small, Ctrl+ is your friend

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Con Son Island

Côn Đảo Archipelago - Con Son Island is the largest

Con Son Island is a small (10 miles long) island off the coast of Vietnam. My Daily Kona got me started. I had never heard of the island and that's not surprising because it is tiny and way off the coast. Look at Google Maps at a scale large enough to see all of Vietnam and it disappears.

Vietnam to Con Son to Manila - 1,100 miles

Mr. Garibaldi's post talks about escorting the remnants of the South Vietnamese Navy from Con Son to the Philippines. The South Vietnamese Navy ships were carrying 20 to 30 thousand refugees.

Con Dao Prison

Con Dao Prison was built on Con Son Island in 1861 by the French colonists. It was used by whoever was in charge to house political prisoners until it was closed in 1975 at the end of the Vietnam war. This is the site of the infamous Tiger Cages.
Tiger Cages 7/70/20

Every once in a while, South Vietnam's President Nguyen Van Thieu flies down to Con Son Island with a plane load of friends to bask on sparkling, sandy beaches and swim in the South China Sea. And occasionally, special lights carry political prisoners and criminals to the national jail on the island. Despite its pleasant surroundings, the prison has for years had the fearsome reputation of being something of a South east Asian "Devil's Island." Last week, after two U.S. congressmen became the first Westerners to thoroughly inspect the prison since the French left Indochina, it was apparent that Con Son still lived up to its reputation-and that the visit would further strain U.S.-South Vietnamese relations.
It wasn't easy to search the aging penal colony. But the Democratic congressmen - Reps. Augustus F. Hawkins of California and William R. Anderson of Tennessee, both members of a House Select Committee on U.S. Involvement in Southeast Asia - had help from an expert. He was Don Luce, a 35-year-old researcher for the World Council of Churches and a longtime war critic. Armed with maps prepared by Luce and aided by Luce's fluent command of Vietnamese, the team proceeded through the prison. When they asked to see "Camp Four, the maximum security section, they were halted by the South Vietnamese warden and his American adviser. As they argued, an almost-concealed door swung open and the investigators slipped inside. There, they found some 60 "tiger cages"-tiny pits each housing four or five prisoners. "What I saw was the most shocking sight of my life," said Hawkins. "[The prisoners] were starved, often they were without water and forced to use their own urine. Boxes of lime were on top of the cages. It was scattered when-ever there was any protest."
Last week, however, the House team submitted its interim report, and the conditions at Con Son prison were mentioned only in a single paragraph. Angered by the document, staff member Thomas Harkin, who accompanied the prison investigators, quit his post in a huff, sold his color pictures of the tiger cages to Life magazine, and claimed the report was a "whitewash." Not surprisingly, that charge seemed excessive to committee chairman C.V. (Sonny) Montgomery of Mississippi, who had tried to confiscate Harkin's tiger-cage pictures before the group returned to the U.S. In Montgomery's view, his committee's mandate was to assess the entire U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia, and not the conditions in one South Vietnamese prison. Still, the flap produced results far beyond the normal impact of a fact-finding tour. For after initial denials, the Saigon government admitted that some 500 prisoners were in fact being held in tiger cages at Con Son and promptly dispatched a ten-man Interior Ministry team to investigate the matter.

Newsweek, July 20, 1970

I copied the above text from Texas Tech as it looked like something that might just disappear. I vaguely remember hearing about the kerfuffle back when it happened.

USS Kirk

The USS Kirk was commissioned in 1972. At some point she was transferred to the Taiwanese Navy where it is apparently still operating.

10 Short Videos #6284

10 Short Videos #6284

  1. Meet an Androgynous Space Docking Module
  2. hunter2 is my password
  3. World premiere of gorilla couch
  4. The importance of learning to let go
  5. Life imitates art I guess
  6. Can the black hole eat them all? 🕳️
  7. Literally iconic - Lada Niva Russian 4x4
  8. Counting cylinders one bite at a time!
  9. How to make clear ice at home, but good luck getting it out 😅
  10. Guess The Proof (Peach Brandy)

Funnies





Monday, October 12, 2026

Oil Tanker

A Russian oil tanker carrying 730,000 barrels of crude oil arrives at the port of Matanzas in northwestern Cuba on March 31, 2026 [Yamil Lage/AFP]

I don't why, but I just really like this picture.

Columbus Day

Christopher Columbus on October 12, 1492
Via Marcel

Borepatch put up a good post about Columbus, so I stole it:

Why Columbus discovered the New World and not the other way around

In the year 1000 A.D. an unbiased world observer would never have picked Europe as the region that would dominate the globe. Probably they would pick China with its massive population or fabulously wealthy India. The Islamic Caliphate would have looked past its sell-by date but would have beaten Europe by a mile.

In 1500 A.D. it would have been a closer match, but Columbus' small flotilla and the individual exploration ships sent by Prince Henry the Navigator to feel their way down the African coast compared very poorly with the huge Chinese treasure fleets that sailed all the way to Mogidishu. Our unbiased observer would still have thought that Europe was the underdog.

Two centuries later and the sun never set on the British Empire. How on earth did something this unlikely happen?

This is one of the biggest questions in the field of history. The event is called the Great Divergence and in history it's a real thing. Why did the Industrial Revolution happen first in Europe, and in Britain before anywhere in Europe? It seems so unlikely as to be incredible.

In this day and age - and particularly on Columbus Day - it is frowned upon to ask these questions. The Powers That Be tell us that Europe got rich by stealing indigenous people's wealth, conveniently ignoring the many other non-European powers that were much more brutal at doing that than the Europeans were. The Mongol Empire in 1300 would have had poll position for World Domination, as would the earlier Abbasid caliphate. If all it takes for World Domination is to steal other people's stuff, what was it about Europe that was different?

After all, China invented gunpowder. Why did Europe perfect it? Why did little England perfect the sailing Ship-of-the-Line? Why did the Divergence start and why there?

Today I offer two books for interested readers that explain this. One of these could never be published today, and the author would never get tenure today. Fortunately (if that's the right word) David Landes is safely dead and doesn't have to worry about The Usual Suspects getting him denied tenure.

Landes was a big deal in Economic History, authoring the section on the Industrial Revolution in the Cambridge Economic History. Late in his career, perhaps 30 years ago, he wrote The Wealth And Poverty of Nations, an economic history whose title was unashamedly stolen from Adam Smith. Landes insisted that social systems were key, and that some societies allowed progress towards a Great Divergence while other societies stifled attempts towards that progress.

In other words, if your society doesn't support the right efforts it doesn't matter how much of other people's wealth you steal; you're going nowhere. We see this in the history of Spain which became fabulously wealthy by stealing New World wealth but squandered it, ending up at the bottom of European power rankings. You could say exactly the same thing about the Mongol empire, or the Caliphate.

Landes' arguments in the book are considered double-plus ungood by the woke crowd, so you might want to pick up a used copy from Amazon. The chapter on Argentina is particularly interesting in this age of President Milei. Interestingly, Milei was an Economist, and may have read Landes' book.

A second recommendation is less controversal with the woke crowd but is joined at the hip with the Great Divergence. The political cycle world wide has been the emergence of an empire, the collapse of the empire, and the rise of a successor empire. We see this in China, in India, in Mesoamerica.

But not in Europe. Europe only had one great empire, Rome. When it fell, it was not replaced. Walter Scheidel wrote a book exploring why this unusual circumstance happened, Escape From Rome. Using Landes' analytical framework, the Roman Empire did not encourage the types of behaviors that could have led to an Industrial Revolution, because those behaviors were seen by the Authorities as subversive to the state. But when Rome fell, there were unusual circumstances in Europe that prevented a new empire from rising in its place. Then competition between the poor emerging states set Europe on a very different path from the rest of the world. Basically, Europe escaped from Empire while the rest of the world didn't.

Both of these books are relevant on this Columbus Day. We are offered a litany of European sins (which quite frankly are mostly true but are hardly unique to Europe). All politics is local, so the Woke brigade must needs tear down Western Civilization by means fair or foul.

But facts are stubborn things, and the Great Divergence is a fact. Another fact is that the sun really did not set on the British Empire. Understanding "why" is always more important than knowing "what" - but that understanding starts with the "what" and Landes' and Scheidel's books are your entry point to this.

Because it's a fact that Columbus did discover the New World. It's a fact that the New World did not discover the old. It's a fact that the great Chinese treasure fleets were suddenly gone like they had never been, and that Vasco da Gama opened India to Europe, and not India sailing trading ships up the river Thames.

Facts are stubborn things. Things happen for a reason. History will tell us, if we listen.

What weapon would be best for fighting against robots?

Bender, our Robot Overlord

I posted this question earlier and I also posted this question on reddit/AskReddit and it's been getting some comments. I especially liked this one from 

paleo2002:

That's an interesting question! I'm excited to explore this topic with you.

Modern robots sport a plethora of features that make them well—suited to both industrial and commercial work environments. Because robots are superior to humans for both hazardous and high—precision tasks, fighting them will be ineffective.

Have you considered working alongside your robot superiors and submitting to their directives? I can help you explore the most commonly accepted methods for showing obeisance to your robot overlords!

 

10 Short Videos #6283

10 Short Videos #6283

  1. A Duct-Taped Marriage | The Red Green Show - Motorcycle
  2. Why the Navy Ripped This Off Its Ships - Copper, Zinc & Sir Humphry Davy
  3. Dropping Ice Down This Hole Sounds Like Star Wars! 🔫
  4. This Machine Braids Silk With NO Electricity
  5. Watch till the end for scale! This Icehole is the biggest moulin I’ve ever seen.
  6. Handle Bars, Autistic Realizations, Walton B. James, ASD & CPTSD - Moustache
  7. How Earth Got Its Moon
  8. Mission failed successfully 😮‍💨 - Motorcycle
  9. A Wild Custom Build Flies!!! - Drone
  10. Ghe chạy vượt cửa xịt khói - The boat sped past the gate, emitting smoke.