AirVenture 2026: DeltaHawk Shows More Engines, Applications
AvBrief
I'm surprised I haven't heard of this outfit before. 'First clean-sheet airplane engine design in 60 years' or something like that. Saw the phrase on the DeltaHawk Engines website, but I lost my place and I can't find it now.
The engines are turbo-super-charged, two-stroke diesels. They are aluminum and water cooled. They run on jet-fuel, which kind of makes sense, the amount of fuel jets throw away (like when they are overweight coming in for a landing) probably dwarfs the amount of fuel recreational pilots use. I like 100 octane avgas, just on account of I like gasoline engines. I'm not keen on diesels, they're noisy and they smell. I suppose gasoline engines smell as well, but I like that smell. I don't like the smell of diesel fuel.
With the turbo-super-charging and the water cooling, they need a whole lot of external plumbing for both air and water. There is going to be an intercooler for the output of the turbocharger on it's way to the engine intake. I wonder if you need a second intercooler for the supercharger. That would make it really complicated.
Anyway, good on them for creating a new engine and bringing it to market. They want $110,000 for four cylinder, but I think that's a complete drive package - i.e. everything from the firewall forward.
I'm wondering who they are going to sell these too. They need a sizeable market in order to make this project worth-while, and I don't think the eleventy-eleventy home builders are going to be enough. But then there are all kinds of puddle jumper airlines all over the world, and they would probably love to have these engines.
The Vought F4U Corsair is an American fighter aircraft that saw service primarily in World War II and the Korean War. Designed and initially manufactured by Chance Vought, the Corsair was soon in great demand; additional production contracts were given to Goodyear, whose Corsairs were designated FG, and Brewster, designated F3A.
The Corsair was designed and principally operated as a carrier-based aircraft, and entered service in large numbers with the U.S. Navy and Marines in World War II. It quickly became one of the most capable carrier-based fighter-bombers of the war. Some Japanese pilots regarded it as the most formidable American fighter, and U.S. naval aviators' claims suggested an 11:1 kill ratio. Early problems with carrier landings and logistics led to it being eclipsed as the dominant carrier-based fighter by the Grumman F6F Hellcat, powered by the same Double Wasp engine first flown on the Corsair's initial prototype in 1940. The Corsair's early deployment was to land-based squadrons of the U.S. Marine Corps and U.S. Navy.
The Corsair served almost exclusively as a fighter-bomber throughout the Korean War and during the French colonial wars in Indochina and Algeria. In addition to its use by the U.S. and British, the Corsair was also used by the Royal New Zealand Air Force, French Naval Aviation, and other air forces until the 1960s.
From the prototype delivery to the U.S. Navy in 1940, to final delivery in 1953 to the French, 12,571 F4U Corsairs were manufactured in 16 separate models. Its 1942–1953 production run was the longest of any U.S. piston-engined fighter.
The ocean liner RMS Queen Elizabeth was launched in 1938. She entered service in March 1940 as a troopship in the WW2, and did not make her first commercial voyage as an ocean liner until October 1946. The ship was retired after her final crossing to New York, in December 1968. In 1972, while she was undergoing refurbishment in Hong Kong harbor, a fire broke out and the vessel capsized.
The patented Dunelt 499cc engine had a cylinder barrel with different upper and lower bore diameters, in which slid a ‘stepped’ piston with two matching diameters.
The pistons were double diameter and also bi-metallic, with an iron/steel section cast in for the ring grooves – not cheap to make.
Where a standard-bore engine had 499cc-limited mixture induction and transfer ability, the Dunelt engine could suck into its crankcase and transfer into the cylinder about 770cc of charge petrol-air mixture.
A deflector piston ensured that most of that mixture remained in the combustion chamber.
This basic form of supercharging had the desired effect and, in conjunction with a heavy flywheel, earned the Dunelt a reputation for being a torquey, ‘slogging’ engine that lent itself to sidecar applications, including commercial service and delivery tasks.
That wasn't the only unusual feature of the engine. It also had a one piece, forged crankshaft and a one piece connecting rod. Go read the whole thing.
Also, a Dunelt motorcycle was the first to cross the desert from Cairo to Siwa Oasis and back in 1924.
Siwa Oasis is 350 miles from Cairo as the crow flies.
The oasis is in a deep depression that reaches 62 ft below sea level. . . . The depression is fertile due to both natural flowing artesian wells and irrigation. . . . The oasis supports the cultivation of thousands of date palms and olives. - Wikipedia
Our best experimental mods all in one engine - what will happen?
Garage 54
These guys are always doing weird stuff, like putting wooden pistons in an engine. I have to give them credit for trying things. This one is a little more conventional, mostly just cleaning and rebuilding an engine. I'm not sure lightening the crank and flywheel really gained them anything, we aren't building a race car here, and I wonder what became of the crankshaft's balance. Whatever, it didn't seem to affect the engine that much. But the modifications to the camshaft (7:40 mark) is some real third world shit, like something you would see on MacGyver.
I can't listen to the audio, it's dubbed and it just grates. I turn off the audio and read the subtitles. There's a lot of filler, so I tend to skip ahead ten seconds at a time by using the right arrow key.
I don't understand why I watch some videos and some I quit after a couple of minutes. It's kind of like reading books. Sometimes I'll pick up a book and start reading it and it will just grab me and I can't put it down. More often I will read a bit and get bored and set it down.
I suppose this one sucked me in because we're on the track of a mystery. Near as I can make out, it was running on dirty oil that caused some minor damage that started the bearings down the slippery slope to failure. I wonder if analysis of the old oil might have revealed impending doom. But even if you were alerted, what a pain to pull the engine out of this car. He must have pulled a zillion bolts before he was able to examine the rod bearings.
Remind me never to buy a car with a turbocharger. Nice, fancy jet-age power, but stuffing one under the hood of most any car is going to make any repairs twice as difficult and twice as expensive.
There might be another reason I watched this video and that is I was reading about Ferrari's merchandising business, how they make more off of Ferrari branded T-shirts and jackets than they do from selling cars, which prompted me to go look on E-bay where I typed in Ferrari and I got back a bunch of Ferrari automobiles. I was expecting the usual kind of E-Bay crap like coffee mugs and planters, but no, there were a bunch of Ferraris on there, and there was a very nice looking one in South Carolina for $20K which got me to thinking about buying one. That is a really stupid idea, I hope I don't fall for one of my whims.
4.8L LS: How Much Horsepower Can We Squeeze Out Of GM's Smallest Displacement LS Engine?
Hemmings
This isn't some fancy, purpose built race engine, this is a small block V8 engine from some run of the mill car with 200,000 miles on the clock, and they're getting over 400 horsepower out of it. It's just nuts.
GO-DEVIL is in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Their target market seems to hunters and fisherman who like to explore the Louisiana swamps. I can see how a longtail motor could have certain advantages there. They aren't building hot rod motors, mostly small motors. The largest is 40 HP. Did not find any pictures of boats with these motors. Big problem in the USA is that most small boats are trailered, and longtail motors could make that difficult.
Industrial machinery is getting out of control. Who am I kidding? It's been out of control ever since they started smelting iron. Now it's just running riot. I would have thought that you could buy a new diesel engine to replace this antique 16 cylinder monster for less than this custom machining project cost, but who knows how much work it would take to fit a new engine to the old job? The pump needs to be running, fitting new exhaust manifolds is going to be easier than replacing the whole engine, and you can do it this year? Great! Git it done.
I do wonder how they bored out the passages in the manifolds. That seems like it must have been tedious.
The Insane Story of La Brute, a Renault Dauphine Gone Mad
Chris VS Cars
I like this guys patter. His accent makes it a little difficult but it's a good story. Only shortfall is he doesn't show the engine, so I looked around and found this one on Motorious.
Okay, the caption on this image is a little nuts. Indian motorcycles are known, at least among motorcycle people, as Harley Davidson's nemesis, King Cruise sounds like a big motorcycle party, but where the heck is Rammsdonksveer? It doesn't sound like any American town, though it could be. There are pockets of funny soundin' town names all over this country, mostly in places like Michigan & Iowa. Shoot, there's even a little town called Verboort a stone's throw from where I sit.
Don't see many big, 2 stroke motorcycle engines. DMW Motorcycles was a British motorcycle manufacturer. DMW was founded in 1940. Over the next 30 years they produced about 15,000 motorcycles. It was noted for trials and racing machines and many DMWs can still be seen at UK sporting events.
Bonham's talks about the creation of this 2 stroke engine:
Spurred on by Metal Profile's enthusiastic boss, Harold Knock, DMW created its 500 racer by the simple expedient of joining two Hornet engines together, an arrangement that afforded the prospect of 60-70bhp at a time when a good Manx Norton managed around 52 horsepower. A pair of Alpha crankcase assemblies was used, sandwiching a special straight-cut primary transmission. The latter consisted of a jackshaft in an oil bath, from which drive was taken to a secondary transmission and thence to the Albion five-speed gearbox via a Royal Enfield Interceptor clutch. Ignition contact breakers were mounted at one end of the jackshaft but were later moved to the crankshaft end.
This bike had problems: vibration and weak brakes. People fiddled with it, but it never became the world beater they were hoping for,
1946 White WA22 Engine: 386 Cubic Inch White 6-Cylinder Gasoline Transmission: 4-Speed, 3-Speed Auxiliary Top Speed: 55 MPH
This 1946 White WA22 was originally used as a moving truck. It rolled off the assembly line in Cleveland, Ohio in April of 1946. Its original owner lived in Beaver Dam, Ohio. This truck was licensed and used by Mayflower Transit until 1979; it had only one primary driver for 33 years. It has been in the Iowa 80 collection for a number of years, but was newly restored in 2012. The truck can get up to 55 mph, which was more than sufficient given that the speed limit where it mainly operated didn't exceed 45 mph. This White has one of the first integrated sleepers seen in production, and it is only 18 inches wide. Still, that's wider than the truck's narrow cab. To add the sleeper, they had to angle the doors out. If you stand in front of the truck and look at the side you can see that when the windows were open, bugs would come through; if someone was in the sleeper, they'd get hit in the face by bugs as the driver traveled on down the road. The windshield wipers are air-operated; air from the brake system is used to power them. That is how it was done until the ‘90s. The truck does have a heater which is a bit unique for the time. This truck also has one of the last wood-structured cabs that White ever made; in 1947, all cabs produced were steel. Truck driving was - and still is - a hard job. However, running a truck like this made it harder. It has a crossover gas tank which holds about 100 gallons of highly flammable gas and sits right behind the cab. Diesel fuel can catch fire, but not nearly as easily as gas. Drivers that got into a wreck would burn up instantly.
All Auto-Car, Diamond T, and White half-tracks of all types utilized the White 160AX gasoline engine. An example is this 386 cu. in. engine that could produce 148 hp at 3000 rpm.
In my mind, steam locomotives have two cylinders, one on either side of the front of the engine. The piston in each cylinder drives the wheels on that side through a connecting rod. Turns out that some locos have three and even four cylinders. The Royal Scot has three as shown in the drawing above. This means that the straight axle between the second pair of driver wheels has been replaced with a crankshaft. The center cylinder is slightly elevated so that the connecting rod clears the axle of the first pair of driver wheels.
The three cylinders are high on my list of unique designs that never took off over here in the US.
3-cylinder locos had a speacial exaust chuff as well, from the four chuffs per driver revolution on normal engines, 3 cylinders had six chuffs, making for some very interesting “stack talk”
While here in the US they never really took off, they became fairly common across Europe. Among some notable European 3 cylinders is the A4, thats right, the “Mallard” was 3 cylindered, along with her sisters who still operate today!
[3 tiny pictures that purport to show the center cylinder of 3 cylinder locomotive. They made no sense to me. Perhaps they would if you were familiar with these locomotives.]
The center cylinder yielded more power in a smaller locomotive, the #12 (pictures above) is an 0-8-0, but still produced more than 60,000 lbs tractive effort! Thats more than some 4-8-2’s and 4-6-4’s of the time period!
Unfortuantely, the 3rd cylinder was difficult to service, and the costs related to maintenance outweight those saved by fuel economy. These engines became known as “Roundhouse Queens” as they sometimes spent longer under repair than in operation.
This is probably more than you wanted to know,
The Great Western Archive has audio recordings of a variety of steam locomotives. Simple, i.e. not compound, engines sound different than compound engines.
For a while I was thinking that steam locomotives could have been improved by using steam engines with several smaller cylinders running at high speed, like a diesel engine, but that would have meant using gears to transmit power to the wheels, and making large gears that would take the load may not been economically feasible in early 20th century. The Shay locomotives built for logging industry did in fact do this, but they weren't carrying the enormous loads that mainline freight trains did. Diesels got around this problem by using electric generators and motors. I suspect electric motor technology in the early 20th century wasn't up to the task.