I put up
a post about a new handgun, the Walther CCP, mistakenly thinking that they had invented a new technology. Queen Tam quickly pointed out my error, and I corrected (beat into submission) my post. This morning I found this long, involved comment on the same post. I was going to reply there, but I dislike the comment editor. It doesn't have enough room for me to spread out and wax philosophical, so we are here, and here is the inspiring comment:
Powerfull rounds with bullets heavier than 7Grams, use two main systems to manage the breechbolt opening after the projectile to go out the barrel; one construction called "Locked Breech" and another known as "Delayed Blowback".
Several actions are present on second group and "Gas Delayed is one of
them with a well known member of HK P7. Though seeming rather simple as
compared to locked breech samples, this working system needs precise workmanship and some additional
measures for positive extraction for charged empty shell since very
high pressure is still existing at initial stage of breechbolt rearward
travel starts causing case separation.
Walther CCP is a new member of this kind, but seemingly having no remedy for possible mentioned case separation. Besides, This pistol's main spring that is giving force for striker, does is not compressed against to the recoil spring similar of new trend striker guns like Glock, but gets compressed against to a hook shaped post provided at rear of frame on which the key part of field stripping process weared. The pistol, therefore, is cocked during the last stage of breechbolt backward travel and, since this construction precludes the necessity of using costy frame and slide counterfitting rails, it is a cheap manufacturing method of inexpensive striker guns like HiPoint.
We'll ignore the typos because it was written in a comment box. This commenter apparently knows a thing or two about guns. He (or she) brings up a couple of interesting points. Case extraction is the first one.
I'm thinking the problem of "case separation" happens when the breech bolt, with it's embedded case extraction hook, starts moving away from the breech too soon. The extraction hook is pulling on the shell, but the pressure inside the chamber is pressing the walls of the shell against the inside surface of the breech with such force that the shell walls cannot slide, and so the extraction hook rips the base of the shell from the body. Not good.
This video about the HK P7 (
Heckler & Koch P7) has a bit (just after the one minute mark) about what
HK has done to alleviate this problem.
In designing a "gas delayed blowback" operated pistol, one would need to carefully consider all of the operating elements:
- the size of the powder charge,
- the position, diameter and length of the gas port,
- the diameter of the piston,
- the mass of the breech block, and
- the strength of the main recoil spring.
All of these would need to be balanced in order to make a smoothly functioning gun. And then you would want to test it extensively.
The second part, about the striker (firing pin?), I'm not too clear about. I think the complaint is that the part that holds the firing pin in the cocked position is prone to wear. If you are someone who puts a hundred rounds through your gun every week, week in, week out, then, yes, this could be a problem. But if you are burning through that much ammo I think you could probably afford to replace this "hook shaped post" occasionally.
If you are running a hundred rounds through this gun when you go to the range then you are liable to run into another problem long before you have worn out the hook, as
this video about the HK P7 (same one as mentioned earlier) tells us just after the 2:25 mark.