Intel's Ronler Acres Plant

Silicon Forest
If the type is too small, Ctrl+ is your friend

A Brief History of Iron and Steel Production

Professor Joseph S. Spoerl
Saint Anselm College

            The production of iron by humans began probably sometime after 2000 BCE in south-west or south-central Asia, perhaps in the Caucasus region.  Thus began the Iron Age, when iron replaced bronze in implements and weapons. This shift occurred because iron, when alloyed with a bit of carbon, is harder, more durable, and holds a sharper edge than bronze.  For over three thousand years, until replaced by steel after CE 1870, iron formed the material basis of human civilization in Europe, Asia, and Africa.

            Iron is the fourth most abundant element and makes up more than five percent of the earth’s crust.  Iron exists naturally in iron ore (sometimes called ironstone). Since iron has a strong affinity for oxygen, iron ore is an oxide of iron; it also contains varying quantities of other elements such as silicon, sulfur, manganese, and phosphorus. Smelting is the process by which iron is extracted from iron ore.  When iron ore is heated in a charcoal fire, the iron ore begins to release some of its oxygen, which combines with carbon monoxide to form carbon dioxide.  In this way, a spongy, porous mass of relatively pure iron is formed, intermixed with bits of charcoal and extraneous matter liberated from the ore, known as slag. (The separation of slag from the iron is facilitated by the addition of flux, that is, crushed seashells or limestone.)  The formation of this bloom of iron was as far as the primitive blacksmith got: he would remove this pasty mass from the furnace and hammer it on an anvil to drive out the cinders and slag and to compact the metallic particles.  This was wrought iron (“wrought” means “worked,” that is, hammered) and contained generally from .02 to .08 percent of carbon (absorbed from the charcoal), just enough to make the metal both tough and malleable.  Wrought iron was the most commonly produced metal through most of the Iron Age.

            At very high temperatures (rare except in a blast furnace -- see below), a radical change takes place: the iron begins to absorb carbon rapidly, and the iron starts to melt, since the higher carbon content lowers the melting point of the iron. The result is cast iron, which contains from 3 to 4.5 percent carbon. This high proportion of carbon makes cast iron hard and brittle; it is liable to crack or shatter under a heavy blow, and it cannot be forged (that is, heated and shaped by hammer blows) at any temperature.  By the late Middle Ages, European ironmakers had developed the blast furnace, a tall chimney-like structure in which combustion was intensified by a blast of air pumped through alternating layers of charcoal, flux, and iron ore. (Medieval ironworkers also learned to harness water wheels to power bellows to pump the air through blast furnaces and to power massive forge hammers; after 1777, James Watt’s new steam engine was also used for these purposes.)   Molten cast iron would run directly from the base of the blast furnace into a sand trough which fed a number of smaller lateral troughs; this configuration resembled a sow suckling a litter of piglets, and cast iron produced in this way thus came to be called pig iron.  Iron could be cast directly into molds at the blast furnace base or remelted from pig iron to make cast iron stoves, pots, pans, firebacks, cannon, cannonballs, or bells (“to cast” means to pour into a mold, hence the name “cast iron”). Casting is also called founding and is done in a foundry.

            Ironmakers of the late Middle Ages also learned how to transform cast pig iron into the more useful wrought iron by oxidizing excess carbon out of the pig iron in a charcoal furnace called a finery.  After 1784, pig iron was refined in a puddling furnace (developed by the Englishman Henry Cort).  The puddling furnace required the stirring of the molten metal, kept separate from the charcoal fire, through an aperture by a highly skilled craftsman called a puddler; this exposed the metal evenly to the heat and combustion gases in the furnace so that the carbon could be oxidized out.  As the carbon content decreases, the melting point rises, causing semi-solid bits of iron to appear in the liquid mass.  The puddler would gather these in a single mass and work them under a forge hammer, and then the hot wrought iron would be run through rollers (in rolling mills) to form flat iron sheets or rails; slitting mills cut wrought iron sheets into narrow strips for making nails. 

While blast furnaces produced cast iron with great efficiency, the process of refining cast iron into wrought iron remained comparatively inefficient into the mid-1800s.  Historian David Landes writes: “The puddling furnace remained the bottleneck of the industry. Only men of remarkable strength and endurance could stand up to the heat for hours, turn and stir the thick porridge of liquescent metal, and draw off the blobs of pasty wrought iron.  The puddlers were the aristocracy of the proletariat, proud, clannish, set apart by sweat and blood.  Few of them lived past forty.  Numerous efforts were made to mechanize the puddling furnace – in vain.  Machines could be made to stir the bath, but only the human eye and touch could separate out the solidifying decarburized metal.  The size of the furnace and productivity gains were limited accordingly” (The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. VI, Part I, 1966, p. 447).

            Another important discovery in the 1700s (by the Englishman Abraham Darby) was that coke (a contraction of “coal-cake”), or coal baked to remove impurities such as sulfur, could be substituted for charcoal in smelting. This was an important advance since charcoal production had led to severe deforestation across western Europe and Great Britain.

            Steel has a carbon content ranging from .2 to 1.5 percent, enough carbon to make it harder than wrought iron, but not so much as to make it as brittle as cast iron.  Its hardness combined with its flexibility and tensile strength make steel far more useful than either type of iron: it is more durable and holds a sharp edge better than the softer wrought iron, but it resists shock and tension better than the more brittle cast iron.  However, until the mid 1800s, steel was difficult to manufacture and expensive.  Prior to the invention of the Bessemer converter (described below), steel was made mainly by the so-called cementation process.  Bars of wrought iron would be packed in powdered charcoal, layer upon layer, in tightly covered stone boxes and heated.  After several days of heating, the wrought iron bars would absorb carbon; to distribute the carbon more evenly, the metal would be broken up, rebundled with charcoal powder, and reheated.  The resulting blister steel would then be heated again and brought under a forge hammer to give it a more consistent texture.  In the 1740s, the English clockmaker Benjamin Huntsman, searching for a higher-quality steel for making clock springs, discovered that blister steel could be melted in clay crucibles and further refined by the addition of a special flux that removed fine particles of slag that the cementation process could not remove.  This was called crucible steel; it was of a high quality, but expensive.

            To sum up so far:  wrought iron has a little carbon (.02 to .08 percent), just enough to make it hard without losing its malleability.  Cast iron, in contrast, has a lot of carbon (3 to 4.5 percent), which makes it hard but brittle and nonmalleable.  In between these is steel, with .2 to 1.5 percent carbon, making it harder than wrought iron, yet malleable and flexible, unlike cast iron.  These properties make steel more useful than either wrought or cast iron, yet prior to 1856, there was no easy way to control the carbon level in iron so as to manufacture steel cheaply and efficiently.  Yet the growth of railroads in the 1800s created a huge market for steel.  The first railroads ran on wrought iron rails which were too soft to be durable.  On some busy stretches, and on the outer edges of curves, the wrought iron rails had to be replaced every six to eight weeks.  Steel rails would be far more durable, yet the labor- and energy-intensive process of cementation made steel prohibitively expensive for such large-scale uses.

            The mass-production of cheap steel only became possible after the introduction of the Bessemer process, named after its brilliant inventor, the British metallurgist Sir Henry Bessemer (1813-1898).  Bessemer reasoned that carbon in molten pig iron unites readily with oxygen, so a strong blast of air through molten pig iron should convert the pig iron into steel by reducing its carbon content.  In 1856 Bessemer designed what he called a converter, a large, pear-shaped receptacle with holes at the bottom to allow the injection of compressed air.  Bessemer filled it with molten pig iron, blew compressed air through the molten metal, and found that the pig iron was indeed emptied of carbon and silicon in just a few minutes; moreover, instead of freezing up from the blast of cold air, the metal became even hotter and so remained molten.  Subsequent experimentation by another British inventor, Robert Mushet, showed that the air blast actually removed too much carbon and left too much oxygen behind in the molten metal.  This made necessary the addition of a compound of iron, carbon, and manganese called spiegeleisen (or spiegel for short):  the manganese removes the oxygen in the form of manganese oxide, which passes into the slag, and the carbon remains behind, converting the molten iron into steel. (Ferromanganese serves a similar purpose.) The blast of air through the molten pig iron, followed by the addition of a small quantity of molten spiegel, thus converts the whole large mass of molten pig iron into steel in just minutes, without the need for any additional fuel (as contrasted with the days, and tons of extra fuel and labor, required for puddling and cementation).

            One shortcoming of the initial Bessemer process, however, was that it did not remove phosphorus from the pig iron.  Phosphorus makes steel excessively brittle.  Initially, therefore, the Bessemer process could only be used on pig iron made from phosphorus-free ores.  Such ores are relatively scarce and expensive, as they are found in only a few places (e.g. Wales and Sweden, where Bessemer got his iron ore, and upper Michigan).  In 1876, the Welshman Sidney Gilchrist Thomas discovered that adding a chemically basic material such as limestone to the converter draws the phosphorus from the pig iron into the slag, which floats to the top of the converter where it can be skimmed off, resulting in phosphorus-free steel.(This is called the basic Bessemer process, or the Thomas basic process.) This crucial discovery meant that vast stores of iron ore from many regions of the world could be used to make pig iron for Bessemer converters, which in turn led to skyrocketing production of cheap steel in Europe and the U.S.  In the U.S., for example, in 1867, 460,000 tons of wrought iron rails were made and sold for $83 per ton; only 2550 tons of  Bessemer steel rails were made, fetching a price of up to $170 per ton. By 1884, in contrast, iron rails had virtually ceased to be made at all; steel rails had replaced them at an annual production of 1,500,000 tons selling at a price of $32 per ton. Andrew Carnegie’s genius for lowering production costs would drive prices as low as $14 per ton before the end on the century.  (This drop in cost was accompanied by an equally dramatic increase in quality as steel replaced iron rails: from 1865 to 1905, the average life of a rail increased from two years to ten and the car weight a rail could bear increased from eight tons to seventy.)

            The Bessemer process did not have the field to itself for long as inventors sought ways around the patents (over 100 of them) held by Henry Bessemer.  In the 1860s, a rival appeared on the scene: the open-hearth process, developed primarily by the German engineer Karl Wilhelm Siemens. This process converts iron into steel in a broad, shallow, open-hearth furnace (also called a Siemens gas furnace since it was fueled first by coal gas, later by natural gas) by adding wrought iron or iron oxide to molten pig iron until the carbon content is reduced by dilution and oxidation. Using exhaust gases to preheat air and gas prior to combustion, the Siemens furnace could achieve very high temperatures.  As with Bessemer converters, the use of basic materials such as limestone in open-hearth furnaces helps to remove phosphorus from the molten metal (a modification called the basic open-hearth process).  Unlike the Bessemer converter, which makes steel in one volcanic rush, the open-hearth process takes hours and allows for periodic laboratory testing of the molten steel so that steel can be made to the precise specifications of the customer as to chemical composition and mechanical properties.  The open hearth process also allows for the production of larger batches of steel than the Bessemer process and the recycling of scrap metal.  Because of these advantages, by 1900 the open hearth process had largely replaced the Bessemer process.  (After 1960, it was in turn replaced by the basic oxygen process, a modification of the Bessemer process, in the production of steel from iron ore, and by the electric-arc furnace in the production of steel from scrap.)

            Unlike many of his competitors, Andrew Carnegie was quick to recognize the importance of the Bessemer, Thomas basic, and open-hearth processes.  He was also among the first steelmakers to grasp the vital importance of chemistry in steelmaking.  These became keys to his success as a steel manufacturer.

            The mass production of cheap steel, made possible by the discoveries described above (and many others not mentioned), has revolutionized our world.  Consider a brief and incomplete list of the products made possible (or better or more affordable) by cheap, abundant steel: railroads, oil and gas pipelines, refineries, power plants, power lines, assembly lines, skyscrapers, elevators, subways, bridges, reinforced concrete, automobiles, trucks, buses, trolleys, refrigerators, washing machines, clothes dryers, dishwashers, nails, screws, bolts, nuts, needles, wire, watches, clocks, canned food, battleships, aircraft carriers, oil tankers, ocean freighters, shipping containers, cranes, bulldozers, tractors, farm implements, fences, knives, forks, spoons, scissors, razors, surgical instruments, ball-bearings, turbines, drill bits, saws, and tools of every sort.

In view of his moral failings, can we really consider Carnegie a “portrait of human greatness?”  The case for an affirmative answer is this. We are heirs to thousands of years of technological progress, and we benefit every day from the ingenuity and hard work of many thousands of blacksmiths, ironworkers, steelworkers, engineers, inventors, chemists, metallurgists, and entrepreneurs, long since deceased, one of whom was Carnegie and few of whom were saints. Our standard of living today owes much to Carnegie’s entrepreneurial drive, self-education, and genius for efficiency. Whatever his flaws – and who among us has none? – Carnegie embodied a type of human greatness that deserves our appreciation and gratitude.  Without forgetting the contributions of others (especially his workers), we should make the same judgment about Carnegie that Stephen Ambrose makes about the men who built the first transcontinental railroad: “Things happened as they happened.  It is possible to imagine all kinds of different routes across the continent, or a better way for the government to help private industry, or maybe to have the government build and own it.  But those things didn’t happen, and what did take place is grand.  So we admire those who did it – even if they were far from perfect – for what they were and what they accomplished and how much each of us owes them.” (Nothing Like It In the World [New York: Simon and Schuster: 2000], p. 382)

Sources Consulted

Ashton, T.S. Iron and Steel In the Industrial Revolution. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1968.

Carnegie, Andrew. The Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986.

Carnegie, Andrew. The Empire of Business. New York: Doubleday, Page & Co., 1902.  (See esp. “Steel Manufacture in the United States in the Nineteenth Century,” pp. 229-242.)

Chard, Jack. Making Iron and Steel: The Historic Processes, 1700-1900. Ringwood, NJ: North Jersey Highlands Historical Society, 1995.

Fisher, Douglas Alan. The Epic of Steel. New York: Harper and Row, 1963.

“Iron and Steel Industry.” Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 12. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1968.

Landes, David. “Technological Change and Development in Western Europe, 1750-1914,” in Postan and Habakkuk eds., The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Volume VI, Part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965, pp. 274-601, esp. pp. 444-8 and 477-496.

Livesay, Harold C. Andrew Carnegie and the Rise of Big Business. HarperCollins Publishers, 1975.

Pounds, Norman J.G. The Geography of Iron and Steel. Second edition. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1963.

Rosenberg, Nathan and L.E. Birdzell, Jr. How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World.  New York: Basic Books, 1986.

Stubbles, John. “The Basic Oxygen Steelmaking Process.”  American Iron and Steel Institute Steelworks Learning Center.

Wall, Joseph Frazier. Andrew Carnegie. Second edition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1989.

* * * * * * * * *

A good way to learn about the iron manufacturing process prior to its transformation in the Industrial Revolution is to visit the Saugus Iron Works, an authentic recreation of the first integrated iron works in North America (1646-1668), run by the National Park Service in Saugus, MA. AND

For more information on Carnegie, see the PBS/American Experience website:

For an index of sites on iron, steel, and Carnegie:


Unknown said...

Thank you so much for sharing such an awesome blog...
Wall paints suppliers in vijayawada

Subhash Komuravelli said...

Nice blog, very interesting to read
I have bookmarked this article page as i received good information from this.

ERP Software Company in Hyderabad

ERP Software Providers in Hyderabad

ERP Software in Hyderabad