This excellent paragraph is talking about Ukraine:
And also hence, the synchronized idiocy on display in France, Germany, and the UK. They were all-in on the neo-con scheme that is now falling apart and its failure has driven them plumb crazy. As the US drops out of the stupid proxy war, they declare their intention to take it from here and go beat-up Russia. Their war-drums are teaspoons beating on so many quiches.
Reading Starship Troopers (a zillion years ago) and we've got soldiers dropping from orbit. I went looking for pictures of such, but bupkis. Well, how about HALO jumps? They're not from orbit, but they can be jumping from 8 miles up, which has so little air you might as well be in space, and I found this image.
Why am I thinking about Starship Troopers? Because the Air Force is building a new missile base on Johnston Island:
Remember back at the beginning, back before the first Starship prototype was even built, when Elon was talking about how the Starship was going to revolutionize international travel? It was kind of a hair-brained scheme, but evidently someone at the Air Force was paying attention, because they realized it could be used to transport cargo as well as people. Any kind of commercial shipping isn't going to use a rocket, they use cargo ships because pound for pound, they are much cheaper. But if you have an emergency somewhere and you need to get a bunch of stuff somewhere quickly, a rocket is just the ticket.
But the Starship is designed to carry people. It's going to be a little tougher on people than an airliner, but soldiers are pretty tough, so it shouldn't be a problem for them.
Landing in remote regions occupied by enemy forces might be a problem though, so we might want to drop our troops in, like paratroopers. We don't have a technique for doing that from orbit, at least not yet, but Starship can manage reentry, and at some point it's velocity will be low enough that troops could safely exit the vehicle, so we would have Starship paratroops, i.e. Starship Troopers.
It's going to be a few years before we get to this point, but it's undoubtedly coming.
Johnston Atoll is in the middle of the Pacific Ocean:
Suzanne Massie, an American scholar, met with Ronald Reagan many times between 1984 and 1987 while he was President of the United States. She taught him the Russian proverb doveryai, no proveryai meaning 'trust, but verify'. She advised him that "The Russians like to talk in proverbs. It would be nice of you to know a few. You are an actor – you can learn them very quickly." The proverb was adopted as a signature phrase by Reagan, who used it frequently when discussing United States relations with the Soviet Union.
The Russian language is replete with many hundreds of proverbs and sayings. . . . Vladimir Dal was a famous lexicographer of the Russian Empire whose collection was published in Russian language in the late 19th century as The Sayings and Bywords of the Russian People*, featuring more than 30,000 entries.
Cleaning out my bookmarks this morning (a futile endeavor, it will never be complete), I came across this old post that I never published, probably because I had more to say, but I got distracted, so it fell in the bit bucket. Anyway it was originally written back in June 2024 and since it seems to be complete enough as it is, I'm posting it now.
Pleasant Beach Scene
I clipped these from an RT video. I had to watch it twice before I realized what I was looking at. I was expecting death, destruction and explosions, but there is none of that.
A few seconds later
Just that these water spouts suddenly appear. There is a smoke cloud in the lower left, but whatever caused it didn't appear to injure anyone. Unfortunately there wasn't any sound in the video, or maybe there wasn't any sound to hear. Things falling through the air don't make a lot of sound, do they?
Ukraine fired several American ATACMS missiles at a target in Crimea. They may have been aiming at the naval base in Sevastopol or a nearby communications facility. Russia claims to have intercepted most of the missiles with their own anti-missile missiles. So these water spouts might be from the debris from the destroyed missiles falling out of the sky, and not from the bomblets that the ATACMS missiles can carry.
Three days ago four US soldiers went missing in Lithuania. They were operating an M88 Hercules recovery vehicle (i.e. a tow truck). The vehicle was found sunk in a swamp, but no sign of the soldiers.
The soldiers' armored vehicle was discovered submerged in 15 feet of water and so far teams have been unable to get inside or pull it out.
Recovery of the recovery vehicle is underway, but it looks to be a long, hard slog to pull it out of the swamp. Hopefully the soldiers will soon be found alive and well. Right now it's anybody's guess as to where they have got to.
Very few people know that the word prestige first indicated a conjuror’s trick. The word was rarely used in English before 1800, but when it was used it had a meaning identical to the Latin præstigum, a magical illusion. A writer in 1777 for instance speaks of “expert jugglers and prestige-practicing impostors,” and the word prestige long continued to mean merit that was apparent and not real.
The modern sense of prestige is said to have begun with Napoleon Bonaparte because the first Emperor of the French was in the minds of his countrymen and others so much larger than life. No one doubts that Napoleon was an extraordinarily talented man; but it is equally doubtless that Napoleon’s talents were greatly magnified by the magical illusion of prestige. Such magnification is the essence of prestige. It is the magnification of prestige that makes a great general appear invincible in the public eye.
Prestige magnifies a good man into a saint, a good scientist into a genius, a good athlete into the greatest athlete of all time.
The were a couple of movies about magicians that came out in 2006. One was The Prestige and the other was The Illusionist. The Prestige gave us an explanation of the term, but at the time, because I had never heard of it used that way before, it sounded like nonsense.
And then there is the word prestidigitation, which refers to sleight of hand or legerdemain, meaning the quick, skillful manipulation of objects, often used in magic tricks or illusions.
The Residence | Official Trailer | Netflix
Netflix
Very entertaining, murder mystery, very Agatha-Christie like. Every character gets their turn on the screen to demonstrate their brand of lunacy and they make the most of it. One episode is named Knives Out, the same name as another Agatha-Christie like murder mystery starring Daniel Craig (yeah, James Bond).
The story is set in the White House and it gives us an in-depth look at the operation of the house: staff, rooms, layout, including some very fancy models of the place. It's a lot bigger than it looks.
Rumor has it that Trump has a replica of the Ark of the Covenant at his home in Florida. Near as I can make out, it is copy of the prop from the Harrison Ford movie Raiders of The Lost Ark. I dunno, maybe it is the original prop. Another rumor says the replica was on tour and one of the stops it made was at Mar-E-Largo.
I got onto this from a story in Modernity News about a CIA Cold War project to use 'remote viewing' to locate the the original. Criminently, 'remote viewing'? Well, I guess, if you are locked in a life or death struggle with godless commies, and you've got money to burn, sure, go ahead and try some crackpot schemes, see if anything pans out. I mean, how many valuable innovations in weapons and tactics started as a crackpot scheme?
Construction of this replica consumed 2700 hours of labor and six pounds of gold. Gold is currently around $3,000 an ounce. Figuring $100 an hour for labor, means this replica cost around $500 thousand.
I didn't not find any solid information on this, it's all just rumor.
Cake - Comfort Eagle (Late World with Zach)
SgtRlee
I imagine you have heard about people vandalizing Tesla cars and Tesla dealerships. 'Vandalizing' is putting it mildly. You may have also seen this meme:
How many people will believe whatever you tell them? I suspect it's a fairly large share of the population. You can increase that share with relentless propaganda, which is what the Democratic Party has been doing since, I dunno, forever? The Republicans have their own propaganda, but until recently they have not been as organized or pervasive as the Democrat's stuff.
How many people think for themselves? Of course you need to allow for the fact that many people don't waste anytime thinking about politics. So, not many.
Then you look at Moslem suicide bombers. Is there anything atrocious than killing yourself in order to kill a bunch of infidels? Why do they do it? Because they believe, in something, I'm not sure what. The Ayatollah built a religion, taught a bunch of people to believe in absurdities and then sent them out to commit atrocities.
That basically sums up American politics in the 21st Century. See Brave New World for a more in depth analysis.
Bought a new lawn mower last week. I have a small lawn in front of the house and another small lawn in the back of the house. The house is built on a hill, so the backyard is one story lower than the front. Once upon a time there was a path going down the side of the hill so a lawn mower could be wheeled up or down the hill, but a while back we put in some fancy stone stairs right over this path, so no more wheeling the lawn mower up and done the hill. Lawn man didn't care, he had a partner, so the two of them could easily carry the lawn mower up and down the stairs.
But now Rob's partner is moving on, Rob is cutting back, and so carrying the mower is no longer viable. For a long time I've been trying to think of a solution, like replacing the wooden steps on the other side so they incorporated a ramp, or making some kind of removable ramp that could be laid over the stone steps, but all these seemed like a lot of work (which meant expensive, like a couple of thousand dollars), so nothing ever came of it. But now push has come to shove and I realized simply buying a lawn mower and keeping it in backyard would solve the problem.
About a month ago I dialed up Craigslist and saw several ads for used mowers that looked like a good deal. I fiddle farted around and didn't do anything about it, and the next week when I went back all the good deals were gone. So I go to Home Depot and Amazon and found several mowers for under $400. Then I remembered Home Depot had sent me a coupon for 10% off, so I went with them.
There are cheaper mowers available, but I've found that the cheapest item is not always a good deal. Spend a little more and you are likely to get much better quality.
I thought about an electric mower, but the electronics and the battery scare me. Electronic circuits are generally very reliable these days, but if they fail there is usually no recourse than to replace the whole circuit, and it will likely cost as much as the mower. Same deal with the battery, except that it will almost certainly die before you want it to, which means buying an expensive replacement battery. Probably cost near as much as the mower in the first place. After all, tool companies practically give away the tools in order to sell you a battery.
Anyway, this mower with a cover and the discount was less than $350. It only took me nine years to arrive at this solution. Very sad.
"Second, because online platforms serve as critical intermediaries, integrating across business lines positions these platforms to control the essential infrastructure on which their rivals depend."
and I can't make sense of it, especially this phrase:
"integrating across business lines positions these platforms to control the essential infrastructure"
Eventually I realize that "integrating across business lines" is a noun. The sentence might have more easily made sense if those words were hyphenated, like this:
"Second, because online platforms serve as critical intermediaries, integrating-across-business-lines positions these platforms to control the essential infrastructure on which their rivals depend."
Once I finally deciphered it, I can no longer see what was so confusing about it.
BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14
Focus Features
Wonderful psychological thriller.
Someone inside the UK's national security apparatus is selling secrets to the enemy and George (Michael Fassbender) is tasked with finding them. To this end he employs a man who comes up with a list of five people all of whom are co-workers, and one of whom is George's wife Kathryn (Cate Blanchett). George is the polygraph (lie detector) man and normally he would call each of these people in for a session with his machine, but this time he decides to try something different and instead invites them all for dinner at his home.
Nothing comes of this first dinner, but now his wife is off on Black Bag mission, 'Black Bag' meaning secret and she can't tell him anything about it other than she will be back in couple of days. George's professional curiosity is aroused, so he swaps his keycard for hers (a black plastic card with no identifying marks), uses it to sneak into her office, checks up on her and finds she is going to Zurich. Hmm.
He finds an old theater ticket in a trash can by her dresser, memorizes the date and time, and replaces it. He asks her if she has seen this film (Dark Windows) and she denies it. We see them in the theater when something shocking appears on the screen, everyone in the theater reacts except her. Then there is a second shocker and this time she reacts. So, was that ticket hers, or not? If not, how did it get there? I am puzzled.
Meanwhile, a Russian dissident who is under surveillance by this UK spy outfit manages to elude his watchers. They are watching the house where is using some kind of thermal camera that shows there are a number of people in the house. There is an interruption in the camera feed for a couple minutes and now the number of people is reduced by half. The conclusion is that he has slipped away and that he had advance knowledge of the glitch that he must have gotten from someone in this spy outfit.
Now George gets Clarrisa, the IT girl (Marisa Abela), to 'borrow' a surveillance satellite during a three minute period that occurs during a 'handoff', presumably while the satellite is changing its focus. They zoom in on the coordinates George stole from his wife's computer, and what do you know, we see his wife walk into the scene and sit down on a park bench in Zurich. A man comes in and sits down with her. IT girl uses a facial recognition program to identify this guy. Turns out he is in cahoots with the Russian dissident who slipped away.
Kathryn meets with a CIA guy and tells him that these two Russians are driving across Poland. The CIA sends a big fat drone and blows up their truck, putting a stop to their plan to cause a meltdown of a Russian nuclear reactor. They expect such a disaster would bring down Putin.
George hosts a second get together at the same table in his house, but this time there is no food. He starts the meeting by throwing a handgun into the middle of the table. He explains the situation and waits for the culprit to reveal himself. He explains that the ticket in the trash was a very poor ploy to implicate his wife. She is an experienced spy and would not leave anything so obviously incriminating where George could find it. The culprit reveals themself by picking up the gun and firing a couple of rounds, but they are blanks. Kathryn reaches into her purse, pulls out a gun and shoots the culprit dead.
There were a couple of interesting little snippets. While George is preparing dinner, wearing a white long sleeve dress shirt and an apron, he splashes a little bit of red sauce on the cuff of his shirt. It is barely noticeable, but he goes off to change it. Just reinforcing George's image as fastidious.
In another we have Arthur, the head of this department (Pierce Brosnan looking like an old man, well duh, he is an old man. Very disconcerting because James Bond never ages.), sitting down for dinner at the counter of a tiny restaurant. He is served a fish on a plate. We are treated to a close up of the fish's head and the fish is still alive. Never mind that people eat all kinds of weird food, Arthur is apparently a weirdo because eating live animals is pretty much verboten in Western Culture.
I read the teaser for a transcript of Matt Taibbi's interview with Walter Kirn. They mentioned some people I had heard of, some I hadn't and some I wasn't sure about, so I looked them up. I didn't read the whole thing because I either need to subscribe or install something on my phone. I'm not going to subscribe because I have too many subscriptions all ready, and I'm not going to install anything on my phone because it came already loaded with a bunch of crap that I don't want, need or use. Matt Taibbi has appeared here before.
Walter Kirn - is an American novelist, literary critic, and essayist. He is the author of eight books, most notably Up in the Air, which was made into a film of the same name starring George Clooney. - Wikipedia
Up in the Air - Ryan Bingham works for an American human resources consultancy firm specializing in employment-termination assistance. His work constantly takes him around the country, conducting company layoffs on behalf of employers. Ryan also gives motivational speeches, using the analogy, "What's in Your Backpack?" to extol living free of burdensome relationships and material possessions. - Wikipedia
David Shor - then worked as a senior data scientist with Civis Analytics in Chicago for seven years, where he operated the company's web-based survey. On May 28, 2020, Shor tweeted a summary of an academic study by Omar Wasow, a black political scientist at Princeton University, that argued riots following Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination likely tipped the 1968 presidential election in Richard Nixon's favor. Some critics argued that Shor's tweet, which was posted during the height of the George Floyd protests, could be interpreted as criticism of the Black Lives Matter movement. Jonathan Chait wrote in New York Magazine that "At least some employees and clients on Civis Analytics complained that Shor's tweet threatened their safety." Shor apologized for the tweet on May 29, and he was fired from Civis Analytics a few days later. Wikipedia
Luigi Mangione - is an American man who has been identified as the suspect in the killing of Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare. Thompson was shot to death in New York City on December 4, 2024. Wikipedia
Matt Taibbi: "Right. Look, there was a very recent... Well, let’s talk about the comeback. One of the few magazines where it’s still important to be on the cover in America is People Magazine. And Luigi recently got on the cover. Okay, it’s not People Magazine, but he was on the cover of InTouch Magazine, Luigi Mangione."
Brian Thompson - was the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, the insurance arm of UnitedHealth Group, from 2021 until his death in 2024. He joined the company in 2004 and previously led its government programs. Thompson was known for his advocacy of using technology to improve healthcare services, and for his ability to connect with people. - Google
Meghan Markle - Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is a former actress, media personality, and American member of the British royal family. She is married to Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and they have two children, Archie and Lilibet. Meghan is known for her advocacy work for women and girls, and has been recognized with the NAACP President's Award and the Robert F. Kennedy Ripple of Hope Award. - Google
Walter Kirn: Yeah. About a week ago, he suddenly turned in the most inorganic planned way, went, “Free Luigi.” The creation of a political American revolutionary. You know what? He’s obverse Oswald. Oswald was an assassin who became a villain. This is a villain assassin who’s becoming a hero. They dressed him like in the same sweater that Oswald used when he was actually shot by Jack Ruby. They have cited and alluded to and sampled, let’s say in the language of rap and recording, every major American sort of anti-establishment rebel in building this character. The reason I knew he was going to come back from the moment he came out was that he was an obvious op against the oligarchs, Elon in particular. So they gave him some space to be in jail for a while, but now as his trial approaches, we’re going to see this stuff ramp up, we’re going to see an intense sort of almost Beatlemania meets Charles Manson-style cult of personality around him. And that’s what he is to me, is Beatlemania versus Manson. If you did an AI study of American anti-heroes, you would come up with Luigi.
Bill Burr - William Frederick Burr is an American stand-up comedian, podcaster, actor, writer, and director. Google
I've seen some Burr clips on YouTube, and some of it is a funny, but his constant stream of abuse and hostility gets old pretty quickly.
They talk about the New Jersey Drones and as near as I can tell there is still no clear explanation.
Funny about the number of merchant marine sailors killed. All the stories I've heard up till now kind of implied that not many sailors died, that most of them managed to board life boats and were later rescued. But History Guy says 36,000 sailors died and 3,500 ships sunk. That's like ten men per ship. Since by the time of WW2 most ships were burning oil instead of coal, so they wouldn't have needed a black gang of a dozen men to shovel coal, so I'm thinking ten men was probably the whole complement, which means most sailors on ships that were torpedoed died. Makes the War of the Atlantic much grimmer.
Route of the Ben Lomond
The route from Port Said to Cape Town is barely visible, so I tried plotting it on Google Earth, but after it crashed for the third time I gave up. Probably crashed because I'm still using Windows.
Other stories about people adrift in the middle of the ocean:
This is the worst show in the world. I only sat through all ten episodes because my wife thought it was okay. The episodes were only 20 minutes, so the torture only lasted for three hours. Never again, mind you.
We've got two budding female concert pianists. One is a nice girl, the other is the 'most popular girl in the school' who also happens to be a complete psychopath. Anyone who irritates her, she kills, and if it is convenient, she finds someone else to take the fall. She's been doing this for I dunno how long, maybe 20 years. The heroine, the nice girl, has been plotting her revenge for the last ten years or so, but she is no match for our psycho-killer. I mean nobody in this show shows the least ability to defend themselves when psycho girl comes after them. Now at a first encounter that might be plausible, after all psycho-girl does a good job of acting like a good girl, so when she suddenly picks up a pair of scissors to stab you, you might get taken by surprise. But all the attacks that happen in the show happen to people who already know how crazy she is and they still show absolutely no sense. Effing idiots, the lot of them.
Anyway, we sat through all ten episodes fully expecting the story to be resolved and psycho girl crushed to a pulp or at least arrested and taken to jail, but nothing happens. The series ends and all we have to show for it is a bunch more dead bodies and psycho girl is still out running around loose. Oh, and she's dragging her baby around with her. Fully expect her to kill the kid, but it hasn't happened so far and after this I don't care what happens to any of these characters.
Ancient power-hammers and the city that put steel in the world
Lindybeige
Lindybeige is a character. I like the way he ties multiple subjects together: history, geography, economics, technology and even working conditions. From 6:55 to 11:20 he talks about his sponser. It's a little long, but entertaining. At 11:55 we have this line:
It’s happening again. Europe is once again going totalitarian and this time there’s a decidedly familiar communist stench. The outcome was predictable for many of us in the alternative media and the situation is only going to get worse in the next few years, but what does this mean for the rest of the world? With the European elites casting off their humanist masks and going outright Orwellian, what kind of chaos can we expect to unfold?
First and foremost I want to point out a key piece of irony here – For decades in the US we heard the tiresome argument that our 2nd Amendment gun rights are meaningless because they are “unnecessary in maintaining our freedoms”. Anti-gun rights activists and politicians commonly used Europe as their sterling example:
“If gun rights are so important for freedom, then what about the Europeans? They have strict gun laws and they’re not losing their rights…”
As Americans who understand what it means to fight a rebellion against tyranny and win, our response to this claim has always been the same: “Just give it time…”
Of course, we were right and they were wrong. I’m sure a large number of people among the 95% of EU and UK citizens that are disarmed are probably wishing desperately for firearms right about now. The reasons why are numerous and horrifying.
He goes on about how European governments are crying for war which reminded me of a couple of memes I saw recently:
Why is it always you three?
March through Poland
I was thinking the other day that the USA should evaluate potential allies on the basis of how well they have implemented the rights we have in our Bill of Rights, and how well their culture follows the Ten Commandments.
A 1937 space adventure written for young people by Prof. A.M. Low, then-president of the British Interplanetary Society. The occupants of a spaceship launched from a stratosphere balloon discover a hostile civilization.
I mean, WTF? CIA headquarters, bastion of National Security, has got loose screws running around, um, er, loose? You don't suppose this has anything to do with Trump releasing the JFK assassination files yesterday, do you? No, it couldn't possibly be, could it? I dunno, we'll have to wait and see. It might be a really good show.
“All happy families resemble one another; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”
Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina (1878)
“For as health is but one thing, and has been always the same; whereas diseases are by thousands, besides new and daily additions: so all the virtues that have been ever in mankind, are to be counted upon a few fingers; but his follies and vices are innumerable, and time adds hourly to the heap.”
Jonathan Swift, Tale of a Tub (1704)
The word wayward is a cropped version of the word awayward, and it may mean either strong-willed or disposed to act contrary to the way that is right. As an accusation, the charge of waywardness may therefore be sinister or sincere. A sinister accusation comes from overbearing and bossy accuser; a sincere accusation warns not to stray into the labyrinth of strange ways.
We all know that the world is full of meddlesome nags and scolds who are outraged and angered by anyone who deviates from their way. We also know that there are dangerous ways that take men on a one-way trek into the labyrinth of strange ways.
It should be noted that Tolstoy’s famous line speaks of the “resemblance” that happy families have to one another. He does not say they are identical or exactly alike. Like happy individuals, they have the will to insist on their right to express their own natures and be themselves; but they also have the wisdom not to plunge through the gate of the labyrinth of strange ways.
I cannot distill that wisdom into a rule because wisdom is the knack for choosing rightly when there are no rules. Wisdom laughs at those meddlesome nags and scolds but it does not laugh at the labyrinth of strange ways.
Swift tells us that health is simple and disease complex. Likewise virtue and vice. Virtuous men are not identical, but neither do they exude the off-putting odor of waywardness that we indicate with words such as odd, weird, peculiar and strange. When we say a man is peculiar, we do not simply mean that he has the courage defy the herd and be himself. We mean that there are strong and disquieting indications that he is a pervert trapped in the labyrinth of strange ways.
There is a profound difference between a free spirit and a man who is just plain weird.
The World's Fastest ACTUAL Car: The Story Of The Turbinator
SuperfastMatt
The Vesco family:
John Vesco (1910-1983) was a Bonneville pioneer, attending the first 1949 Speed Week together with wife Betty and sons Don and Rick.
Don Vesco (1939 – 2002) was an American businessman and motorcycle racer who held multiple motorcycle land-speed and wheel-driven land speed records. In his lifetime, he set 18 motorcycle and 6 automobile speed records.
His accomplishments recognized by the American Motorcyclist Association include winning the United States motorcycle Grand Prix 500 cc class in 1963, operating a California motorcycle dealership that sponsored up to 60 racers at a time, and setting a number of motorcycle and automobile land speed records.
Rick Vesco set his first land speed record at age 16 on the Bonneville Salt Flats. Rick designed and built the World's Fastest Wheel Driven car that set an F.I.A. record @ 458 MPH (2001) with Don driving.
When I wrote about Rhodes’ ambitious program to sell the Iran deal, I advanced the term “echo chambers” to describe the process by which the White House and its wider penumbra of think tanks and NGOs generated an entirely new class of experts who credentialed each other on social media in order to advance assertions that would formerly have been seen as marginal or not credible, thereby overwhelming the efforts of traditional subject-area gatekeepers and reporters to keep government spokespeople honest. In constructing these echo chambers, the White House created feedback loops that could be gamed out in advance by clever White House aides, thereby influencing and controlling the perceptions of reporters, editors and congressional staffers, and the elusive currents of “public opinion” they attempted to follow. If you saw how the game worked from the inside, you understood that the new common wisdom was not a true “reflection” of what anyone in particular necessarily believed, but rather the deliberate creation of a small class of operatives who used new technologies to create and control larger narratives that they messaged to target audiences on digital platforms, and which often presented themselves to their targets as their own naturally occurring thoughts and feelings, which they would then share with people like themselves. . . .
What I did not imagine at the time was that Obama’s successor in the White House would not be Hillary Clinton but Donald Trump. Nor did I foresee that Trump would himself become the target of a messaging campaign that would make full use of the machine that Obama had built, along with elements of the American security state. Being physically inside the White House, it turned out, was a mere detail of power; even more substantial power lay in controlling the digital switchboard that Obama had built, and which it turned out he still controlled. . . .
A key technique used in the Obama's 'digital switchboard':
permission structures - is most commonly defined as a means of providing “scaffolding for someone to embrace change they might otherwise reject.” This “scaffolding” provides:
social proof (most people in your situation are now deciding to)
new information
changed circumstances
compromise
As one author put it, “with many applications to politics, one could argue that effective Permission Structures will shift the Overton Window, introducing new conversations into the mainstream that might previously have been considered marginal or fringe.”
Later on we get this:
The effect of the permission structure machine is to instill and maintain obedience to voices coming from outside yourself, regardless of the obvious gaps in logic and functioning that they create. The clinical term for this state is schizophrenia, . . .
Note: The first time I opened the essay, all I got was a plain orange screen. There is supposed to be a giant image there, but for some reason it didn't load. Anyway, scroll down a bit and you will get to the text.