I don't know whether Dyson vacuums are really any better than anybody else's, I've never tried one, and they are kind of expensive. But I am impressed that James not only invested the time and effort to try and build a better mousetrap, but persevered long enough to build a company that manufactures and sells his vacuum. Too often it seems a company will introduce a product that is good enough and then proceed to make and sell the same device for a hundred years without changing any more than the color of the paint or the style of the logo. All investment goes into marketing, none is spent on research and development. I suppose sex appeal has a lot to do with it. Isn't a vacuum cleaner just as sexy as a hot rod or a jet airplane? Well, maybe not.
Remember, there are two sides to the free market: on one hand customers are going to be looking for the highest quality product for the lowest possible price. On the other, in order to make a profit (i.e. make it worthwhile to continue in this line of work), the manufacturer will want to deliver the lowest quality product for the highest possible price.
Via Phys.org
No comments:
Post a Comment